Working to make government more effective

Press release

The Hancock affair shows yet again why Johnson must overhaul the ministerial code

The ministerial code is not working, is being undermined by the prime minister and requires urgent reform, says a new paper by the IfG.

Matt Hancock, former health secretary
Matt Hancock, former health secretary, leaving Downing Street

The ministerial code is not working, is being undermined by the prime minister and requires urgent reform, says a new paper by the Institute for Government.

Published today, Updating the ministerial code argues that Boris Johnson should fundamentally overhaul the rules which govern the standards of behaviour to which ministers are expected to adhere.

Recent revelations about a lack of transparency in government, particularly around meetings with Greensill Capital, and the questions of accountability prompted by the Hancock affair make clear that more than just piecemeal updates are need. The prime minister must take this opportunity to demonstrate that he believes in upholding the highest ministerial standards in government.

While Johnson says that he values high standards in government, his actions reveal otherwise. By rejecting his independent adviser’s conclusions when the home secretary was accused of bullying civil servants, and by saying he ‘considered the matter closed’ when the news of Hancock’s breach of Covid rules broke, Boris Johnson has undermined the code. While the prime minister will always be ultimately responsible for standards in government – or the lack of them – a strengthened code, with proper independent investigations, will help rebuild confidence that standards still matter.

The report recommends that:

  • The existence of the ministerial code, like the codes governing the behaviour of civil servants and special advisers, be given a statutory underpinning.
  • The prime minister’s independent adviser be allowed to start investigations and publish findings without prior prime ministerial agreement.
  • New concerns should be reflected in the code:
  • Accusations of conflicts of interests in Hancock’s appointment of Gina Coladangelo as an adviser and then a non-executive director at the Department for Health mean more explicit guidance may be needed on relationships in government.
  • Criticisms of Boris Johnson discussing government business via messages on his personal phone should be taken seriously, with the new code banning ministers from using personal phones to conduct government business.

To strengthen the ministerial code, the report also recommends that:

  • The new code explain that a range of sanctions are available for breaches, to avoid immediate calls for resignation.
  • Ministers publicly commit to abiding by the code.
  • The new code update rules on accountability for special advisers, and strengthens transparency of ministerial meetings.
  • The new code should better distinguish between standards of behaviour and processes of government, to make the code easier to understand and uphold.

Tim Durrant, associate director at the Institute for Government, said:

“The prime minister claims to value high standards of behaviour in government, but under his watch the system upholding them has been severely weakened. His decision to publish a new version of the ministerial code is an opportunity to repair some of the damage.”


Notes to editors
  1. The Institute for Government is an independent think tank that works to make government more effective.
  2. For more information, including data to reproduce any charts, please contact press@instituteforgovernment.org.uk / 0785 031 3791.

Related content

26 FEB 2024 Insight paper

Rebuilding trust in public life

The next government should start the difficult process of showing the British public that the institutions on which we all rely can be trusted.

27 JUL 2023 Podcast

Special: Sunak’s ethics plan

Fleur Anderson MP, John Penrose MP and Dr Susan Hawley from Spotlight on Corruption join us to look at the government’s plans to improve standards.