Motions are statements that outline a topic for Parliament to discuss or a question for it to decide. They help to structure parliamentary debate.
Tabling a motion means formally submitting it to be considered by Parliament. Once tabled, the motion will appear on the Order Paper (the day-by-day parliamentary timetable). However, this does not necessarily mean it will be debated. Whether a motion is debated depends on parliamentary time being found for it.
In the Commons, any MP may table a motion, but whether it will be debated will depend on their position.
Most motions that are ‘moved’ are tabled by the Government. The opposition parties also move motions as part of Opposition Day debates, while backbenchers may move amendments if they are selected as part of a Backbench Business Committee debate. Urgent Questions and Emergency Debates also provide an opportunity for backbenchers to propose questions for debate, with the Speaker deciding whether to grant parliamentary time.
MPs may show their support for an amendment by putting their name to it, known as ‘becoming a signatory’.
An MP or Peer can also withdraw their motion before it is moved.
Moving a motion means introducing it for debate. This will only occur if parliamentary time has been found to consider the motion. Motions are usually moved by the MP or Peer who tabled them. Once moved, the debate will be opened out to other MPs or Peers. In the House of Commons, the Speaker plays a significant role in deciding who to call to speak in debates.
There are various types of motions, including:
- Motions under an Act of Parliament: some Acts of Parliament specify that a motion must be put to Parliament in specific circumstances, allowing MPs and/or Peers to debate an issue and express a view. This is the motion that the Government will have to table within three sitting days if it loses the meaningful vote on the Prime Minister’s Brexit deal.
- Business motions: these are used to organise parliamentary debate on a case by case basis. They are put forward by the Government and can propose changes to the Standing Orders (the parliamentary rules). The Government used this motion in order to allow for the meaningful vote debate.
- Motions for a return (a ‘humble address’): this is an archaic form of motion used by Parliament to demand papers from the Government.
- Confidence and censure motions: confidence motions allow MPs to test whether the Government continues to command the support of the Commons.
- Early Day Motions (EDMs): a type of motion used in the Commons to allow MPs to express their view on, or raise awareness of, a particular issue. Most are not usually debated.
How motions are expressed can be important. Motions expressed in neutral terms simply ask Parliament to consider a topic and allow MPs or Peers to talk about a specific issue. Motions expressed in non-neutral terms, or ‘substantive’ motions, ask Parliament to take a view on an issue or take a decision. The meaningful vote is a substantive motion.
The Government is not legally bound to comply with most types of motions. However, some types of motion have historically been considered binding, such as motions for return, motions under an Act of Parliament and confidence motions under the Fixed-term Parliaments Act.
Like bills, parliamentarians may table amendments to some motions.
In the House of Commons, the Standing Orders (the parliamentary rules) allow amendments to be made to motions expressed in ‘non-neutral’ terms, also known as ‘substantive motions’.
In the House of Lords, the Standing Orders allow all types of motion to be amended. This includes resolutions, which are a type of motion used by the Lords to express a definite opinion or take a decision on an issue.
Amendments to motions can only be proposed by a member of the House the motion is tabled in. This means MPs cannot amend a motion in the Lords, or vice versa.
In the Commons, any MP can table amendments to a substantive motion. As with amendments to bills, it is possible for MPs to show their support for an amendment by adding their name to it.
In the Lords, any Peer, other than the individual tabling the motion, may propose an amendment.
In the Commons, the Speaker decides which, if any, amendments will be debated and voted on. In some cases, the Speaker may decide how many amendments they will select before any have been tabled. This gives the Speaker significant influence in shaping the debate, which can be controversial. The Speaker does not give reasons for their choice, and their decision cannot be challenged.
In the Lords, all amendments will be debated unless they are withdrawn. They will usually be considered in the order in which they relate to the motion, unless they relate to the same part of the motion, when they will be debated in the order in which they were tabled.
The Government can also choose to accept amendments to motions it tables, in which case they are incorporated into the motion without a vote.
The Speaker’s ability to select amendments for debate, and the Government’s freedom to accept amendments without a vote, can have important ramifications for parliamentary debate, and may play a key role in the parliamentary course of Brexit.
In the Commons, amendments must be tabled before the House finishes business the day before the debate. In exceptional circumstances, amendments made after this deadline, referred to as ‘manuscript’ amendments, may be accepted. This could be the case where new information has come to light after the usual deadline, justifying a late amendment. However, as with manuscript amendments to bills, they are unlikely to be accepted by the Speaker without good reason.
In the Lords, any motion can be amended with or without notice.
In the Commons, if an amendment is selected for debate, the MP who tabled it is usually called upon to move it. The Speaker will then formally propose it and call other MPs to contribute. In theory, there is no time limit for such speeches, but the Speaker will often introduce one if there are many MPs wishing to contribute.
The time available to debate substantive motions in the Commons (and amendments to them) is usually fixed, with the length of the debate decided by a business motion, or being drawn to a close at the end of the day’s business in the House.
In the Lords, all amendments can be debated and voted upon. The Peer proposing the first amendment will move their amendment, and other Peers will then join the debate and vote on the amendment.
The time available to debate and vote on motions in the Lords may be limited by a business motion. To take part in a debate, including to move an amendment, Peers are usually expected to add their name to the Speakers’ list by 6:00pm the previous weekday (or 4:00pm on a Friday).
- On 4 December, the Government was found in contempt of Parliament, following a vote on a contempt motion, due to its refusal to publish the Attorney General’s advice on the legal implications of the Northern Ireland backstop.
- Criticism has also been levelled at the Government’s handling of Opposition Day debates. Historically, losing a vote on an Opposition Day debate was politically embarrassing and MPs of the governing party were whipped to attend these debates and vote against the Opposition’s motion. However, in recent years the Government has sought to avoid defeats by telling their MPs not to vote, leading some to claim it is showing insufficient respect to Parliament.
- The Government has also been chastised for its response to a ‘motion for a return’ or ‘humble address’ calling on the Government to release information related to no deal planning.