Archive for Peter Riddell

Peter took up the Directorship at the Institute for Government on 1st January 2012. He was previously a Senior Fellow at the Institute and divided his time here with his work for the Detainee Inquiry, a privy counsellor panel looking at whether the British Government was implicated in the improper treatment of detainees held by other countries (a role from which he resigned at the end of last year to concentrate on the IfG). At the Institute, he co-authored reports on Transitions and Ministerial Effectiveness and has been closely involved in work on political and constitutional reform. Until mid-2010, Peter was a journalist for nearly 40 years, split between the Financial Times and The Times, where he had been their domestic political analyst and commentator. He has been a regular broadcaster, has written seven books and delivered frequent lectures. He chairs the Hansard Society, a non-partisan charity which promoters understanding of Parliament and representative democracy. He will be stepping down from this role in the next few months. Peter has received two honorary doctorates of literature, is a Fellow of the Royal Historical Society, an Honorary Fellow of the Political Studies Association and was one of the first recipients of the President’s medal of the British Academy. He was appointed to the Privy Council in July 2010 in order to serve on the Detainee Inquiry.

Peter Riddell’s Posts

Margaret Thatcher – an effective Prime Minister

, 9 April 2013

She was obviously an extraordinary political leader, with a unique, uncompromising style. She did not shrink from confrontation and openly scorned consensus. She was a conviction politician, who sharply divided people. While, in retrospect, you can point to tides of opinion – against the trade unions and the post-war state – which ran in...

Posted in Leadership for government | No Comments »

Public inquiries – be careful what you wish for

, 3 April 2013

Be careful what you wish for was central theme of a fascinating seminar about public inquiries held at the Institute for Government just before Easter—which featured Lord Butler, who chaired the privy counsellor inquiry into intelligence about weapons of mass destruction ahead of the Iraq war; Lord Bichard, who ran the inquiry into child...

Posted in Parliament and the political process | No Comments »

The cabinet secretary should not be dragged into investigations

, 21 January 2013

This is a murky, and still unresolved, affair in which Sir Jeremy played a peripheral role. He was asked by David Cameron to examine whether two e-mails sent by a constituent of John Randall, the Deputy Chief Whip, changed the Prime Minister’s original assessment of the Chief Whip’s conduct. Sir Jeremy concluded that the...

Posted in Parliament and the political process | 2 Comments »

Laying down the law

, 12 December 2012

At the heart of this fiasco is the story of a department attempting an innovative approach to commissioning but never getting to grips with it. The Treasury signed off the process on the basis that this was “a pilot to inform future decisions, but would not represent a final model for future franchises”. Even...

Posted in A more effective Whitehall | 1 Comment »

West Coast Mainline 2: Laidlaw confirms it’s serious

, 30 October 2012

The cautious, and heavily caveated, interim report demolishes the ‘rogue trader’ view: that the flawed process was the result of mistakes by just a few civil servants. Rather, they ‘appear to have been caused by factors including inadequate planning and preparation, a complex organisational structure and a weak governance and quality assurance framework’. The questions...

Tags:
Posted in A more effective Whitehall, Parliament and the political process | Comments Off

West Coast Mainline

, 3 October 2012

Of course, such incidents should not tarnish the whole Civil Service. There are many examples of high quality performance, improvement and commitment to reform across Whitehall, not least in the handling of the Olympics project by the Civil Service (to be discussed in a series of forthcoming Institute for Government events, and a report)....

Tags:
Posted in A more effective Whitehall | 1 Comment »

Improving accountability— an urgent search without easy solutions

, 17 September 2012

The Government is right to look overseas for ideas on alternative structures of ministerial/civil service relations. There is a strong case for strengthening accountability, both within Whitehall and with Parliament. But the new review, to be conducted by outsiders, is likely to find that, while there are intriguing lessons from abroad, there are no...

Tags: ,
Posted in A more effective Whitehall | Comments Off

Paul Deighton’s challenge as a minister

, 5 September 2012

Paul Deighton is the latest in a distinguished line of GOATs brought in to provide business and delivery expertise for the Government. The future Lord Deighton — as he will become when he takes over in January from Lord Sassoon as unpaid Commercial Secretary to the Treasury — has had a very successful career...

Posted in Leadership for government | Comments Off

U-turns — better late than never

, 29 May 2012

U-turn is among the most over-used terms in political debate along with ‘the most disastrous week ever’; ‘it’s not brain surgery/rocket science’; ‘UKplc’. It is part of gotcha journalism and politics, when a government weakness and policy change is highlighted — as is happening now with the withdrawal of Budget proposal on hot takeaway...

Tags:
Posted in Better policy making | 1 Comment »

Better late than never

, 3 April 2012

All organisations should evaluate their policy successes and failures—the theme of a fascinating series of policy reunion seminars and events at the Institute for Government organised by Jill Rutter, who also hosted workshops for Treasury staff for this review. Understanding what works and what doesn’t is central to improving later performance. With the Financial...

Posted in A more effective Whitehall | Comments Off