<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bad reviews? Lessons from the Beecroft report</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/blog/4467/bad-reviews-lessons-from-the-beecroft-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/blog/4467/bad-reviews-lessons-from-the-beecroft-review/?source=rss</link>
	<description>Institute for Government Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 17:00:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: What Puffles spotted on the blogs &#38; online &#8211; 23 June 2012 &#124; A dragon&#039;s best friend</title>
		<link>http://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/blog/4467/bad-reviews-lessons-from-the-beecroft-review/comment-page-1/#comment-1452</link>
		<dc:creator>What Puffles spotted on the blogs &#38; online &#8211; 23 June 2012 &#124; A dragon&#039;s best friend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2012 22:44:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/blog/?p=4467#comment-1452</guid>
		<description>[...] Adrian Beecroft&#8217;s report blew up in the faces of everyone after, under cross-examination by MPs he admitted that he had not done nearly as much detailed research as perhaps he should have done. The footage from the Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Bill Committee from 13:55:00 is particularly interesting. But then we knew Beecroft&#8217;s report was not the greatest piece of work in the world. Jill Rutter of the Institute for Government tore it to pieces last month. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Adrian Beecroft&#8217;s report blew up in the faces of everyone after, under cross-examination by MPs he admitted that he had not done nearly as much detailed research as perhaps he should have done. The footage from the Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Bill Committee from 13:55:00 is particularly interesting. But then we knew Beecroft&#8217;s report was not the greatest piece of work in the world. Jill Rutter of the Institute for Government tore it to pieces last month. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
