Working to make government more effective

Comment

The fiscal squeeze: now it gets real

Today marks the start of the government's financial year, and with it the point when our fiscal squeeze gets real.

Today marks the start of the government's financial year, and with it the point when our fiscal squeeze gets real. It is easy to forget just how large the challenge we have set ourselves is.

I’ve just returned from giving a seminar in Berlin to public servants from various European countries. They were eager for more details on the UK’s fiscal consolidation. When you tell our international friends that the UK is, for example, taking 20+% out of our law and order budget, a regular response is that "we are doing the same – a 10/20/30% reduction in the administration costs of our police". It takes a little while for the penny to drop that our 20+% applies to the whole budget – administration, police pay, running costs of prisons, etc. The next question is invariably "do you really think the UK can achieve that?"

Where it depends on political capital

This is, of course, a question whose answer is automatically "it depends".  The challenge has many elements. Many of the tax rises have already come in, with more due next week. But the almost 80% of our consolidation that comes from spending reductions is only just beginning. Many welfare cuts come into effect today. Further reductions in subsidy regimes will take longer – for example university teaching grants fall in 2012-13 (with the income to be replaced by tuition fees), while legal aid reductions are expected to be fully delivered by 2014-15. All of these will be a challenge, but it is largely political rather than operational. So for these changes, "it depends" mainly on your assessment of the government’s political capital – has it enough to drive them through?

Where it depends on capacity to manage change

The major operational challenges lie elsewhere – in the cuts to public sector organisations’ own running costs. Some portents for the future are already visible in Whitehall itself. The latest headcounts statistics for the civil service show that the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills reduced by almost 10% in the last quarter of 2010. The Central Office of Information (CIO) shed 35% in the same period. But the overall message from the numbers is not much has yet changed. This will alter dramatically in the coming months. By the end of the year, the statistics should be reflecting the major reductions in the senior civil service and beyond occurring in departments such as Communities and Local Government, Transport, and Justice. However, other departments are moving more slowly. There is quite a debate about the correct strategy here:

  • is it best to take the pain quickly, allowing the smaller organisation to concentrate on its future?
  • or – should Whitehall departments concentrate on managing the change for the rest of the public sector, postponing their own reorganisation until these are achieved?

Whether the UK can achieve its planned consolidation depends crucially on public sector managers getting calls like this right. There are few funds to bail out failing organisations, and little spare political capital to spend on absorbing service failures. So for these changes, "it depends" mainly on your assessment of the public sector’s capability to manage change. Ironically, a government that has been seen to question the effectiveness of the public sector is implicitly relying on it being able to pull off a feat that makes our international friends' jaws drop.

Keywords
Budget
Publisher
Institute for Government

Related content

19 APR 2024 Podcast

Trust in government up in smoke?

Polling expert Will Jennings joins the podcast team to discuss what legacy Liz Truss has left the Conservatives in the polls.